A version of this article appeared in Syntagma recently.

Gold rushes come and go in the world’s innovation capital, California. But when they go … they really go.

The City of Vallejo in California has filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy, making history it seems. Half Moon Bay, home to some internet digerati, may well be next. According to John Moorlach, Orange County board chief, “This is the tip of the iceberg: everybody is going to line up for Chapter 9 in California.”

What can it mean to people on the ground when their city goes belly up? What of their assets, houses etcetera? It will be interesting to watch this pan out.

According to Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers American house prices are likely to fall 25pc from peak to trough. With between 10m and 12m households in negative equity already, there’s still a way to go.

Shares across the developed world are set for big falls too. Albert Edward Société Générale’s global strategist says, “Nowhere and nothing will be immune. We are on the cusp of an equity meltdown that will slash and shred portfolios. We see a global recession unfolding. Liquidity will drain away and crush the twin emerging market and commodity bubbles. The recent hope that ‘the worst might be over’ is truly staggering. Profits are disintegrating.”

Ambrose Evans Pritchard of the Telegraph (UK) — ever the Cassandra — says pointedly, “Britain, Europe, Japan, and China will go down before America comes back up. This is turning into a synchronised bust, after all. The Global Slump of 2008-09 is under way.”

The Bank of England and the European Central Bank are still stubbornly refusing to cut rates because of inflation fears, which will be the least of our miseries in the next two years and should abate soon as global demand falls off the much-imagined cliff.

It’s probably true that Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve has saved the U.S. and other countries from another Great Depression. But nothing can stop a slump now because it’s already happening.

The penny seems to have dropped for Robert Greifeld and his Nasdaq team that Clara Furse’s gritty defence of London Stock Exchange independence is winning hands down.

On Friday they seemed to have thrown in the towel when it was announced that the Nasdaq offer of £12.43 per share would not be increased, although the deadline for acceptances would be extended until February 10.

Neither the UK Government nor the Office of Fair Trading have offered any comfort for Furse in this steely tussle. She was left to make the business case without the kind of protectionism enjoyed by Nasdaq, which is virtually bid-proof.

For the fifth time in recent years she appears to have made that case supremely well. LSE shareholders, like the hedge funds, owe her nothing, yet have stood firm — so far. Victory is tantalizingly in sight.

When Nasdaq chief Greifeld flew back from the Davos Economic Forum in Switzerland on Friday, he overflew London and went straight back to New York. The symbolism of that move is clear. Clara is not for turning, and Robert knows it.

There are still dangers galore for a newly-refreshed LSE post-February 10. Greifeld could make good his threat to dump his entire near 30pc stake in the LSE onto the market, possibly causing a precipitate decline. That would not be good business, however, and could lose money if the hedge funds cut and ran.

In the longer term newer exchanges permitted under EU laws, such as Project Turquoise might upset the delicate balance of pricing and attraction for new IPOs.

Those are problems for the future, however, and will not prevent victory tasting very sweet.

Nasdaq is increasing the fees it charges listed companies, sending a frisson of fear through users of the London Stock Exchange.

British companies are now wondering whether Robert Greifeld will use a fee hike to recoup costs if Nasdaq takes over the LSE. Fees at the American exchange rose by 22pc for smaller companies and 27pc for larger ones.

On Nasdaq, annual fees start at £16,000 ($30,000) rising to £51,000 ($96,000). In London, the equivalent range is £3,600 ($6,768) to £35,000 ($66,000).

With the country’s electricity sector starved of investment, Russia’s biggest power company is planning an £800m float on the London Stock Exchange which would value the company at £3.2 billion.

The UK Independent newspaper reports : “UES, which owns the country’s power stations through dozens of operating companies such as Mosenergo, wants to raise almost £42bn for the investment-starved electricity sector by the end of the decade. If approved, a listing could see 25 per cent of Mosenergo’s equity listed in London and would take place early next year. Another UES subsidiary, OGK 5, is also planning a listing in London later this year as part of the group’s restructuring. But Mosenergo, also known as TGK 3, is much bigger than its Urals-based sister company”

Russian state-controlled oil giant Rosneft listed in London in July, raising £5.6bn. The successful flotation has encouraged the Kremlin to raise more funds in this way.